Category: Blog

Valuation Reserve Requirements

According to FitchRatings, over the past 12 months ending August 2026, there were 109 defaults by 89 entities, compared to the same period ending July 2026 where 83 entities saw 105 defaults. With businesses (especially life insurers) exposed to asset…

3 min read

Valuation Reserve Requirements, what is AVRAccording to Fitch Ratings, over the past 12 months ending August 2026, there were 109 defaults by 89 entities, compared to the same period ending July 2026, when 83 entities saw 105 defaults. With businesses (especially life insurers) exposed to asset management risks, it’s important to understand how to find financial balance.

Defining Asset Valuation Reserve (AVR)

An AVR is a repository for life insurance companies to offset a drop in markets and/or asset portfolios that are meant to fulfill contractual obligations for claims, annuities, and related insurance obligations.

According to the American Council of Life Insurers and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), the AVR factors in every realized investment profit and loss after factoring in net deferred taxes for credit and equity investments. Companies are required to fund the AVR initially and adjust it annually to manage ongoing and future obligations.

As part of the agreement that insurance companies have to pay out an insurance claim in exchange for receiving premiums, an insurance company has to ensure they are financially solvent to keep paying out claims. The same requirement also pertains to annuities that an insurance company contracts with customers, including making periodic payments. Through the valuation reserve requirements, insurance companies can measure their reserves and investments to increase the chance they’ll be able to meet their financial obligations regularly.   

Depending on the interest rate environment, insurance companies can experience threats to their allocated reserves to continue annuity payments over time compared to life benefits paid out all at once. Based on the American Council of Life Insurers, the percentage in reserves for annuities increased to 23 percent in 1990, up from 8 percent in 1980, showing how insurers must keep up with client demands and manage risk.    

How it’s Constructed

An AVR creates an organized set of entries for the assets and liabilities. Insurance companies are also able to compare assets and liabilities against actuarial valuation standards to plan for projected unknown, unsettled asset shortfalls. It also helps companies monitor the appropriate detection of long-term anticipated stock investment proceeds. For publicly traded insurance companies, it provides greater transparency for equity and bond holders, along with regulators.

The default component accounts for four-fifths of the AVR. Insurance companies implement investment vehicles such as mortgages and fixed-income options to manage their credit risk. As the name implies, the equity piece of the AVR balances the reserve with preferred and common equities or stocks, along with real estate investments. This mix is required for insurance companies because it creates a buffer from gains realized from positive market years, which offset insurance company obligations during periods of negative market performance.

Building the AVR is unique to each company’s financial makeup and needs to be dynamic, but must follow industry standards. While insurers or any market participant cannot predict the market with 100 percent accuracy, insurers with a properly constructed and reported AVR can more easily navigate an economy that becomes turbulent and uncertain.

Sources

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/corporate-finance/fitch-ratings-us-private-credit-default-rate-rose-to-6-3-in-august-2026-14-09-2026

https://www.acli.com/-/media/ACLI/Files/Fact-BooksPublic/2019FLifeInsurersFactBook.ashx?la=en

https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/call_materials/4%20-%20AVR%20IMR%20Final%20Rept%20to%20NAIC%20%20Dec%202002.pdf

Rolling Over Your 401(k) Just Got Less Painful – Here’s What the IRS Changed

Anyone who has moved retirement money out of an old employer’s plan knows how frustrating it can be. Every administrator has their own forms. Timelines are all over the place. Paper checks show up weeks later…

4 min read

Rolling Over Your 401kAnyone who has moved retirement money out of an old employer’s plan knows how frustrating it can be. Every administrator has their own forms. Timelines are all over the place. Paper checks show up weeks later with vague instructions. The whole thing should have been fixed a long time ago.

The IRS is finally doing something about it. Notice 2026-49 puts out four sample forms and a five-step procedure meant to bring some consistency to direct rollovers. Plans do not have to use them, and there is no safe harbor, but you can see where this is going.

The Problem Worth Solving

When you leave a job, you have to figure out what to do with your 401(k). You can cash it out and take the tax hit. You can leave it sitting there. Or you can roll it into a new employer’s plan or an IRA.

A direct rollover is usually the way to go. The money travels straight from the old plan to the new one without ever hitting your bank account, which keeps things clean and avoids the 60-day deadline you face if you take possession yourself.

The trouble is that every plan does things differently. A 2024 GAO study found that roughly one in three people doing rollovers ended up with a paper check in hand that they were supposed to forward themselves. Checks get lost. They sit on the counter for weeks. And the whole time, that money is not invested anywhere.

How the New System Works

Here is what Treasury is proposing. You fill out Form 1 and give it to the plan or IRA that will be receiving your money. That form lets the receiving plan reach out to your old plan and handle the transfer on your behalf. The two plans swap Forms 2 through 4 to make sure everything is in order. If something goes sideways, the receiving plan has to tell you.

The IRS wants this done electronically whenever possible. When electronic is not an option, the old plan should write a check payable to the receiving plan for your benefit and mail it directly there. No more sending checks to participants and hoping they take it from there.

Tax Rules Stay the Same

None of this changes how rollovers are taxed. Eligible distributions that complete a proper rollover still stay out of income. You still cannot roll over a required minimum distribution. Pre-tax money stays pre-tax. Roth stays Roth. This is about the plumbing, not the tax code.

IRA-to-IRA transfers are not covered here. Those already go through the ACATS electronic system, so Treasury left them alone.

No Safe Harbor Yet

Plans can use these forms, change them, or ignore them completely. Right now, there is no reward for following along.

That could change. Treasury says it is thinking about offering safe harbors down the road. A receiving plan that uses the standard forms might eventually be allowed to assume the rollover is valid unless something looks off. That would give administrators a real incentive to adopt the new process.

Conclusion and What Comes Next

The IRS has hinted at bigger changes. Future guidance might require electronic transfers across the board, kill off the practice of mailing checks to participants, and get rid of some of the procedural friction that slows things down.

For now, the sample forms are sitting in the appendix of Notice 2026-49. They are there if you want them. If you have ever spent weeks tracking down a check that went to the wrong address or trying to explain one plan’s process to another plan’s administrator, you understand what Treasury is trying to fix. They want rollovers to be faster, simpler, and harder to mess up. This is a start.

How to Account for Bonds

With the global bond market size bigger than many of the world’s biggest economies, it’s important for businesses that sell bonds to understand how to report transactions properly. According to the International Capital Market…

3 min read

How to Account for BondsWith the global bond market size bigger than many of the world’s biggest economies, it’s important for businesses that sell bonds to understand how to report transactions properly. According to the International Capital Market Association (ICMA), the global bond market’s capitalization is more than $128 trillion.

Defining Bonds

Offered by government or corporate entities, bonds are a static commitment issued to investors. Entities earn money from investors to invest in infrastructure or support operations. Investors receive a coupon payment periodically, and the bond is settled at a future date, which is referred to as the maturity date.   

When bonds are tendered, they may be done at a discount, at face value, or at a premium. The valuation relies on the gap at issuance between a bond’s coupon rate and the bond’s yield based on prevailing prices. Upon bond issuance, the bond’s face value is recorded under bonds payable, as the issuing entity receives payment for the bond’s prevailing market value. If there’s a positive difference, it’s recorded at a premium. If there’s a negative difference, it’s recorded at a discount.

Bond Issuance and Accounting Considerations

When sold at par value, after the corporation or government entity receives payment from investors, the issuing entity records it as a liability because it’s liable for the investor’s investment. This would be set up as:

 
    Debit Credit
Cash   $100  
  Bonds Payable   $100

 

Bonds Payable Defined

Since the entity owes the investor, bonds payable is recorded on the liability section of a business’ balance sheet. Much of the time, bonds payable are reported as non-current liabilities.

When sold at a discount, a gap exists between a bond’s par value and the monetary investment the issuing entity obtains from the investor; the issuing entity must record the transaction as a discount on bonds payable account. The journal entry is as follows:

 

    Debit Credit
Cash   $100  
Discount on Bonds Payable   $100 $100
  Bonds Payable   $100

 

If bonds are purchased at a premium, which is when investors pay more for a bond with a higher interest rate, providing higher coupon payments, entities must record it as a premium on bonds payable (POBP) account. It often occurs when purchasers agree to lesser earnings due to the bond having a higher rate than prevailing rates. In the case of a bond’s issuance at a premium, it can be recorded as follows:

    Debit Credit
Cash   $100  
  POBP   $100
  Bonds Payable   $100

 

If there’s a discount on bonds payable, the recurrent record must reflect the interest expense with a debit transaction and the bonds payable entry must see a credit. This accounting method impacts the bond issuer by growing the total interest expense, which the issuer records.

If, however, the issuer receives payment from investors beyond the face value, the interest expense must be credited, and the premium on bonds payable entry should receive a debit.

Conclusion

Whether it’s a business issuing bonds or an investor evaluating a company, understanding how to account for bonds is essential to evaluate a business’ financial health.

Pre-Election Focus on Russian/Iran Sanctions, AI Utility Bills, Crypto Regulation and Nondiscriminatory FEMA Assistance

Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027 (HR 6500) – This appropriations bill was finalized and passed…

4 min read

Pre-Election Focus, AI Utility Bills, Crypto RegulationContinuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027 (HR 6500) – This appropriations bill was finalized and passed by both the House and the Senate on Sept. 1. The act funds the fiscal year 2027 government budget through Dec. 11 at current levels. It was signed by the President on Sept. 2.

Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act (S 307) – This bill is designed to address sexual harassment and sexual assault of Bureau of Prisons correctional officers and other staff by incarcerated prisoners. Specifically, it details national standards for the prevention, reduction, and punishment of perpetrators. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) on Jan. 29, 2025. It passed in the Senate on April 29, 2025; in the House on Aug. 31; and was enacted by the president on Sept. 16.

Retire through Ownership Act (S 2403) – Introduced by Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) on July 23, 2025, this bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. ESOPs are Employee Stock Ownership Plans that enable employees to accrue shares of their employers’ stock as part of a pension plan, in which they receive the cash value of their shares upon retirement. This bill clearly defines how a good-faith valuation should be determined by independent professional appraisers, based on IRS Revenue Ruling 59-60 for valuing privately held stock. In the past, ambiguous valuation methods have resulted in litigation. This act passed in the Senate on October 9, 2025, and in the House on Sept. 16. It currently awaits the president’s signature.

Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 (HR 5334) – This largely bipartisan act was championed by the late Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). The legislation imposes a variety of sanctions, tariffs, and prohibitions related to Russia and Iran, and explicitly prohibits U.S. persons from making new investments in Russia. It also expands the tax deduction for early childhood education teachers for classroom expenses. The bill was introduced on Sept. 11, 2025, by Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-CA). It passed in the House on April 27 and in the Senate on Aug. 7, with final changes agreed upon on Sept. 16. The president signed the bill into law a day later.

Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (HR 3633) – Known as the Clarity Act, the purpose of this Trump Administration-backed bill is to implement the first regulations for the crypto sector. The bill was introduced by Rep. French Hill (R-AR) on May 29, 2025. It passed in the House on July 17, 2025. However, opponents of the bill say the industry-led standards are far too lenient and do not provide enough safeguards. The bill recently failed in the Senate after a party-line cloture vote, which means the debate ended before the floor could vote on the bill (considered a filibuster). The cloture vote does not rule out the Senate trying again at a later date.

Ratepayer Protection Act (HR 9340) – In an effort to rein in AI data center utility costs, this bill would require state utilities to consider adopting standards to ensure cost recovery for the generation, transmission, and distribution services of large-load electricity customers. This high-stakes, bipartisan issue comes ahead of the midterm elections in an effort to assure voters that local data centers will not ramp up local residents’ utility bills. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Gabe Evans (R-CO) on June 18. It passed in the House on Sept. 16 and currently resides in the Senate.

Stopping Political Discrimination in Disaster Assistance Act (HR 1342) – Current law states that federal major disaster emergency relief and assistance must be provided without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, nationality, sex, age, disability, English proficiency or economic status. The bill, introduced by Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) on Feb. 13, 2025, would add political affiliation protection under this requirement. The act passed in the House on Sept. 16 and awaits consideration in the Senate.

 

AI-Powered Corporate Fraud: What Business Leaders Need to Know

For years, corporate fraud was limited by the costs, expertise and resources required to carry out a convincing deception. Artificial intelligence (AI) has changed this…

4 min read

AI FraudFor years, corporate fraud was limited by the costs, expertise, and resources required to carry out a convincing deception. Artificial intelligence (AI) has changed this.

Today, AI can create realistic voices, videos, emails, invoices, identities, and customer interactions at a scale and speed that traditional fraud controls were never designed to address. AI-powered fraud is a governance, financial, and strategic risk – not just an IT problem.

The Evolution of Corporate Fraud

Fraud is no longer limited to static phishing emails. Threat actors, from organized criminal syndicates to rogue insiders, use large language models and advanced machine learning to execute complex, multilayered fraud schemes.

One of the most cited reference cases is the 2024 Arup incident. A finance employee at the engineering firm’s Hong Kong office was tricked into transferring about $25 million across multiple transactions after joining a video conference call with deepfake replicas of the company’s CFO and other colleagues. The fraud succeeded because it targeted the human authorization step, the exact step where financial controls assume identity can be trusted on sight and sound.

Beyond deepfake executives, new trends include synthetic vendor creation, where generative models fabricate entire corporate entities. Each comes complete with tax IDs, websites, regulatory filings, and executive profiles. They are used to infiltrate accounts payable systems. Bad actors also use machine learning to reverse-engineer enterprise anti-fraud algorithms, find blind spots, and execute micro-transactions that stay beneath detection thresholds.

Why the Numbers Should Worry Boards, Not Just Security Teams

AI-powered scams grew 1,210 percent in 2025, more than six times the growth rate of traditional fraud. Deepfake video scams alone went up 700 percent. The 2026 International AI Safety Report confirmed the tooling behind this is free or low-cost, requires no technical skills, and can be deployed anonymously.

The 2026 INTERPOL Global Financial Fraud Threat Assessment flagged AI-powered fraud as one of organized crime’s primary growth sectors. It reports that fraud alerts have risen 54 percent since 2024, with more than 1,500 cross-border cases involving $1.1 billion in lost assets.

The Regulatory Gap Executives Should Worry About

Regulation is accelerating, but it is not solving the fraud problem. The EU AI Act’s transparency provisions took effect Aug. 2. It requires the disclosure of AI-generated content, with penalties for noncompliance. As of July 2026, 48 states in the United States have enacted at least one deepfake-related law, according to Ballotpedia’s tracker. Yet none of these frameworks is really built for enterprise fraud. They target content moderation, disclosure, and non-consensual media. None directly addresses the authorization workflows attackers actually exploit. A company that is fully compliant with deepfake laws would still be exposed by the Arup scenario.

Regulators such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have signaled that using AI to deceive is prosecutable under existing fraud statutes, but enforcement is reactive and case-by-case. Executives who treat fraud as just a criminal act rather than a governance failure arising from inadequate technical oversight face severe personal and corporate liability.

Strategic Challenges and Recommended Actions

Defending against AI-powered fraud requires rethinking how security spending is justified. Traditional ROI models rely on historical loss avoidance, but in the age of generative fraud, past losses are an unreliable predictor of future exposure.

The primary implementation challenge is friction versus security. Deploying stronger authentication and behavior monitoring across corporate touchpoints creates friction that employees and vendors resist. In addition, integrating AI defenses into legacy enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems creates technical debt. Organizations also struggle with data silos, even though fraud detection now requires real-time visibility across all departments.

To protect enterprise value, leadership teams should move from passive compliance to active resilience.

  • Verify out of band. Require a callback to a known number and dual approval for large or unusual transfers. Never authorize a payment on a voice or video request alone.
  • Strengthen authentication. Use multifactor cryptographic verification and zero-trust principles (verify every request, regardless of source). Treat biometrics with caution, since deepfakes can spoof them.
  • Red-team for AI fraud. Have ethical hackers use generative AI to stress test internal systems and give the risk committee ownership of the results.
  • Use AI to fight AI. Deploy monitoring tools that flag behavioral anomalies across internal communications, ledger entries, and vendor registries in real time.
  • Establish cross-functional fraud task forces. Break down departmental silos and treat fraud detection as an integrated business process.

Future Outlook

As AI advances, the convergence of generative AI and autonomous software agents suggest that corporate fraud may increasingly be automated, including by self-directed AI agents operating as fraud syndicates. Business leaders must recognize that the future of corporate defense relies not on human vigilance alone, but on building resilient, self-healing digital ecosystems where trust is algorithmically verified and continuously audited. 

How to Save Energy This Fall

Temps are dropping, the leaves are turning and you know what that means: Fall is here, which is the best time to prepare your house for the chill that follows. But we all know that keeping warm takes energy and, yes, is costly. Here are…

3 min read

How to Save EnergyTemps are dropping, the leaves are turning, and you know what that means: Fall is here, which is the best time to prepare your house for the chill that follows. But we all know that keeping warm takes energy and, yes, is costly. Here are a few easy ways to conserve.

Fix stuff around your house. These are simple and might require a little elbow grease on your part, but they’re well worth it because they help your house stay warmer, eliminate drafts, and help your heater work more efficiently.

  • Seal gaps around your windows and doors with caulk or weatherstripping. 
  • Close fireplace dampers when you’re not using them.
  • Replace HVAC filters. For your furnace, this should be done one to three months before cold weather hits. It helps improve air quality (and air flow) inside your home.
  • Add door sweeps to exterior doors.
  • Reverse your ceiling fans; set them to clockwise and put them on a low setting to push the warm air down into the room.
  • Hang thick(er) curtains so heat doesn’t seep out.
  • Make sure vents and returns aren’t blocked by furniture or rugs.

Check your heating system. Before the Arctic blast arrives, these tasks are key:

  • Schedule an HVAC inspection – aka a tune-up.
  • Install a programmable or smart thermostat.
  • Lower your thermostat by 7-10 degrees when you’re away.

Look at your insulation. These chores might require you to hire someone.

  • Add attic insulation if your house is under-insulated so you can reduce your heating costs and keep your house toasty. (In fact, poor insulation is one of the biggest sources of energy loss.)
  • Insulate pipes that are exposed, as well as your water heater.
  • Seal and insulate all your ductwork in your attic, garage, and crawl spaces.

Inspect your water heater. Making sure you have warm water in the cooler months is critical. You’ll be quite happy not having to take cold showers, as well as not expending as much energy.

  • Lower your water heater temperature to 120°F.
  • Install low-flow showerheads.
  • Fix dripping faucets immediately.

Examine the exterior of your house. Even the outside of your home needs attention.

  • Clean gutters and downspouts to prevent ice dams, moisture problems, and foundation issues.
  • Trim branches that could block winter sunlight from south-facing windows.
  • Check for cracks where utilities enter the house and seal them.
  • Check your roof, too, for signs of wear or damage.

Test your heating system early. Put this on your calendar! Don’t wait until it’s a tundra outside to turn on your furnace or heat pump.

  • If you need repairs, schedule maintenance before HVAC companies get all booked up.

Check your smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Don’t leave this unattended!

  • Replace batteries if needed and test them all. You want to make sure your family’s safe during the upcoming heating season.

Even though fall is upon us, know this: Winter is coming, as the show famously claims. You can never be too prepared!

Heirless Estate Planning

The purpose of estate planning is to distribute your assets to heirs in a formal, legal process. If you do not have any heirs to speak of, you might not feel the need to do this. However, your assets will go somewhere, so you may…

6 min read

Heirless Estate PlanningThe purpose of estate planning is to distribute your assets to heirs in a formal, legal process. If you do not have any heirs to speak of, you might not feel the need to do this. However, your assets will go somewhere, so you may want to have control over that before the state steps in to decide for you.

Without a formal will, the general rule for inheritance distribution starts with a surviving spouse and children (who often share the estate), followed by grandchildren, parents, siblings, nephews and nieces, grandparents, then other extended relatives such as aunts, uncles and cousins. The exact order varies by state. Note that ex-spouses, and in most states stepchildren, receive nothing under standard state inheritance laws; they must be specified in a will or trust document, or named as an account beneficiary, to receive any consideration.

This means that, without a will or close family heir, your assets could go to an estranged sibling or even a cousin you’ve never met. If you have absolutely no family left when you pass on, the proceeds generally go to the state through a process called escheat (this includes funds from physical assets that are auctioned off).

Start with Living Matters

Before you start allocating where your assets go after your death, first complete paperwork assigning people to manage your assets if you ever become incapacitated while still alive. The key documents include:

  • Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) – this document names an agent, such as a trusted friend, attorney, or bank trust department, to take over managing your financial and legal affairs if you are deemed unable.
  • Health Care Directive – authorizes someone to make medical decisions on your behalf when you are unable.
  • Living Will – details what life-saving procedures and treatments you would and would not like to receive in order to keep you alive. Separately, a DNR (do not resuscitate) order, signed by your physician, directs medical staff not to perform CPR if your heart or breathing stops.

Choose Your Estate Manager

Your will should assign an executor to manage your estate once you pass away. Again, this can be a friend or a custodian (e.g., bank, attorney, financial advisor). This person is responsible for initiating probate court proceedings and distributing assets as dictated by your will. Responsibilities may include notifying your landlord/lender(s), utility providers, banks, credit card companies, investments, and insurance companies of your passing, as well as managing the sale of any property you own. Most states allow any competent adult to serve as executor, including the attorney who drafted your will, though some states restrict people with felony convictions or those who live out of state.

It behooves the heirless to consider estate planning to better allocate funds toward people or causes they care about, such as friends, coworkers, or charities. For example:

  • Animal shelter or humane society
  • Local church or other religious institution
  • The public library
  • The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS)
  • A local land trust, the World Wildlife Fund or other conservation organizations
  • A favorite city institution, such as a museum, zoo, symphony, ballet or theater
  • Scholarship fund for your alma mater – K-12 or university
  • YMCA or Jewish community center
  • Medical institutions, such as local clinics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Planned Parenthood, cancer or other disease research
  • Charities for children, such as the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children or Children’s Health Fund

If nothing local appeals, browse options at websites such as CharityWatch.org, a website dedicated to assessing how efficiently charities use donations.

Note that retirement accounts and life insurance policies generally request a beneficiary, and many bank and brokerage accounts allow one. You may not even remember that when you opened an account years ago, you listed your boyfriend or wife at the time as your beneficiary, even though that person is now your ex. Be aware that these beneficiary designations supersede any will instructions. These assets pass directly to the named beneficiary outside of probate, without going through your executor. Be sure to check and confirm your beneficiary designations while you are still alive to eliminate this issue. Many states automatically revoke an ex-spouse’s designation after a divorce, but that rule generally does not apply to employer retirement plans such as 401(k)s, so an ex could still collect. If no beneficiary is named, the account typically becomes part of your estate and goes through probate.

Charitable Donations

For people with substantial assets who want to leave money to one or more charities, sophisticated philanthropic vehicles include:

  • Charitable remainder trust – The money is deposited into a trust while you are still alive. You receive an immediate tax deduction based on the present value of the charity’s future share (the remainder interest) of this irrevocable trust, as well as an income stream from the trust for life or for a set term of up to 20 years. When the trust ends, whatever charity you designate receives the remaining assets.
  • Donor-advised funds – You make an irrevocable, tax-deductible contribution of cash, securities, or appreciated noncash assets to a fund, which is professionally managed for future growth. You may recommend money be granted to a qualified 501(c)(3) charity over time, basically leaving a legacy that continues to give.
  • Private foundations – You can actually start your own charitable organization with an initial tax-deductible gift and appoint a board of directors or trustees (who may receive reasonable compensation) to manage and distribute assets according to your wishes. Foundations can make grants beyond public charities in limited cases, but only under strict IRS rules. They must also distribute at least 5 percent of their assets each year and pay an excise tax on investment income, and donors face lower deduction limits than for gifts to public charities.

It is best to consult with a financial advisor, tax professional, or estate planning attorney with experience in setting up a sophisticated charitable giving plan to make the most of your contributions.

Understanding Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

According to the Flossbach von Storch Research Institute, 328 of the S&P 500 companies in 2024 had a negative Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) of $4.5 billion…

3 min read

Understanding Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAccording to the Flossbach von Storch Research Institute, 328 of the S&P 500 companies in 2024 had a negative Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) of $4.5 billion. This is attributed to rising interest rates since 2022 had OCI figures of negative $325 billion. Understanding OCI and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) is essential to see what this means and how it’s calculated.

AOCI is where unrealized gains or losses are listed as a special line item found under the Shareholder’s Equity section of a company’s balance sheet. As part of OCI, all unrealized transactions are excluded from net income on an income statement. OCI is the difference between net income and comprehensive income.

Illustrating How Financial Statements Work

If a business has multiple quarters of OCI, say $500,000 in Q1, $750,000 in Q2, and $1.25 million in Q3, the company’s balance sheet would have $2.5 million on its balance sheet under the AOCI line item in the Shareholder’s Equity section at the end of Q3.  

Investments that are classified as available for sale, not intended to be held until maturity, and are not a loan or a receivable may be recognized as OCI. One example is a bond portfolio that’s not held to maturity that’s seen an unrealized decrease or increase, and the available-for-sale asset can be included. Pension plans, for example, that see an increase in value, the difference, after recipient distributions are deducted, can similarly be recognized as OCI. Derivatives, classified as cash flow hedges, that experience unrealized gains and losses, also may qualify for OCI classification.

Important Considerations

If a transaction is completed and a gain or loss is realized, the reporting is moved from AOCI to the balance sheet’s Net Income section.

While it’s optional for privately held companies and nonprofits that don’t share it with external parties, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) generated a novel standard in 1997 mandating comprehensive accounting for all publicly traded companies in the United States. This is for all income, including other or special types of income, especially for losses/profits not yet realized.

Reporting AOCI accounts on the balance sheet is important because gains and losses impact the balance sheet overall and the business’ income statistics. It’s also important to note that net income and retained earnings on the income statement are not finalized until transactions are completed and moved to a different section of the balance sheet.

According to FASB’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 220, titled “Income Statement — Reporting Comprehensive Income,” the reporting business must document comprehensive income in one or a series of two continuous statements with both other comprehensive income and net income.

Conclusion

Understanding OCI and AOCI work is essential for business owners and external audiences, such as potential investors, when examining a business’ operations.

Focused on Ending Insider Trading, the Penny, Epilepsy, the War in Iran, and Projects that Waste Taxpayer Money

strong>21st Century ROAD to Housing Act (HR 6644) – This bipartisan, White House-endorsed bill addresses housing affordability by placing ownership restrictions on…

4 min read

Focused on Ending Insider Trading, the Penny, Epilepsy, the War in Iran, and Projects that Waste Taxpayer Money21st Century ROAD to Housing Act (HR 6644) – This bipartisan, White House-endorsed bill addresses housing affordability by placing ownership restrictions on large institutional investors and expanding financing for homebuyers. Introduced by Rep. French Hill (R-AR) on Dec. 11, 2025, it passed in the House on Feb. 9 and in the Senate with changes on March 12. The bill went back and forth between the two chambers until both agreed to the final form on June 23. However, during that time frame, the President withheld his support, and the bill was enacted on July 11 by the 10-day rule (meaning it was neither signed nor vetoed by the President within 10 days of receiving the bill from Congress).

Stop Insider Trading Act (HR 7008) – Known as SITA, this bill would expand the penalties for members of Congress who engage in insider trading, beyond those originally imposed by the STOCK Act of 2012. Under SITA, the penalty would increase from $200 to $2000 or 10 percent of the value of the transaction, whichever is greater, plus any profits. Note that despite violations, the STOCK Act penalties have never been successfully enforced. SITA would also ban legislators, their spouses, and dependents from purchasing individual stocks. It would not require them to discard stocks they currently own; however, in order to sell, they must issue a public notice at least seven days in advance. The bill is not likely to pass in the Senate because it contains provisions related to voting restrictions from the controversial SAVE Act. The bill was introduced by Rep. Bryan Steil (R-WI) on Jan. 12, passed in the House on July 22, and awaits consideration in the Senate, which is currently in recess until Sept. 14.

Common Cents Act (S 1525) – This act was introduced by Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) on April 30, 2025. The bill instructs the Secretary of the Treasury to stop minting the penny and issue a rule that requires cash transactions to be rounded up or down to the nearest 5 cents. This bill passed in the Senate on Aug. 7 and is now in the House for consideration.

National Plan for Epilepsy Act (S 494) – This bipartisan bill was introduced by Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) on Feb. 10, 2025. Its objective is to require the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to develop and implement a national plan to prevent, diagnose, treat, and cure epilepsy. Mandatory activities include coordinating research and services across all federal agencies, soliciting public comments, and establishing an advisory council to report to HHS and Congress every two years with an evaluation of federally funded efforts and recommended actions regarding the nation’s progress on epilepsy. The bill passed in the Senate on Aug. 4 and is now under consideration in the House.

Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran (HConRes 89) – This concurrent resolution would direct the President to remove U.S. troops from engaging in hostilities with Iran sans a declaration of war or Congressional authorization to use military force. Note that the resolution does not prevent the US from defending itself, its military, diplomatic installations, or allies from an imminent attack. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) on April 23. It passed in the House on July 23 and currently resides in the Senate.

Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act (HR 1722) – This bipartisan act would require an annual report issued to Congress by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that details taxpayer-funded projects that are over budget and behind schedule. The bill was introduced on Feb. 27, 2025, by Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA). It passed in the House on July 22, 2026, and awaits consideration in the Senate.

Insurance for AI Risk: Is It Time to Consider AI Liability Coverage?

Over the past few years, artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved from a futuristic concept into a core engine of modern enterprise strategy. Organizations across every major industry are now using AI to automate complex workflows…

4 min read

Insurance for AI RiskOver the past few years, artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved from a futuristic concept into a core engine of modern enterprise strategy. Organizations across every major industry are now using AI to automate complex workflows, augment customer service operations, drive predictive decision-making, and unlock greater operational productivity.

Understanding AI Risk

AI is not an easily defined category, as it spans several dimensions that traditional risk frames are not built to accommodate. The Gallagher report, Smart Systems, Blind Spots: Rethinking Insurance for the AI Era, found that the pace of AI adoption surpassed the insurance industry’s capacity to develop responsive products.

What makes AI unique is that risks associated with it emerge from the way systems learn, generate outputs, and make decisions to influence customers, employees, and business outcomes.

Modern businesses face several distinct risk vectors:

  • Biased or discriminatory decisions
    Automated recruitment, lending, or credit-scoring models trained on flawed data can produce systematically unfair outcomes. This can result in regulatory penalties, civil rights litigation, and damaged brand reputation.
  • Hallucinations and inaccurate outputs
    AI models can confidently generate inaccurate or misleading information. A customer-facing AI assistant that provides incorrect financial, legal or medical guidance could create significant liability exposure.
  • Intellectual property and copyright disputes
    Models trained on vast, unvetted datasets reproduce copyrighted material, exposing organizations to costly intellectual property infringement claims.
  • Data privacy violations
    Unintentional exposure of proprietary trade secrets or personally identifiable information (PII) during model training can trigger regulatory investigations under frameworks such as the EU AI Act, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), or state-level privacy laws.
  • Cybersecurity vulnerabilities
    AI introduces new attack vectors, including prompt injection, data poisoning, and model extraction. Malicious actors can exploit these to compromise business integrity.
  • Financial losses
    Autonomous trading agents or algorithmic pricing models operating at high speeds can execute erroneous transactions, leading to immediate financial losses.

Why Traditional Insurance May Not Be Enough

Existing coverage was not designed for current AI issues. Cyber policies were designed around data breaches and network intrusion. This does not cover an AI model making a biased hiring decision or fabricating a financial projection.

Professional indemnity and E&O policies assume a human professional exercised judgment. So, when an algorithm makes a mistake, an insurer may dispute whether the policy was intended to respond. For general liability policies, the focus is on bodily injury and property damage. If an AI program causes bodily injury, insurers can debate whether the policy applies.

Several incidents have caused some insurance companies to exclude AI from their corporate policies. For instance, Google was sued by a Minnesota-based company after its AI Overviews feature named it as a defendant in a lawsuit. This is just one case that highlights the growing concern around “silent insurance” when policies do not explicitly address AI-related risks. However, businesses may assume they are covered when they are not.

The challenge is compounded by the rapidly evolving legal landscape, with governments worldwide introducing new regulations.

The Rise of AI Liability Coverage

In response, a new category is beginning to take shape. This is AI liability insurance. These policies are designed to explicitly address the development, deployment, and use of AI systems. While offerings may vary across providers, AI liability covers incidents such as AI-driven discrimination claims, IP infringement from generative outputs, financial losses from automated decision-making, and regulatory penalties tied to AI non-compliance.

Insurers are approaching underwriting as they did with early cyber policies. They are starting cautiously, requiring detailed disclosure of how AI is used, existing governance controls, and how models are tested and monitored.

Beyond Insurance: Building Comprehensive AI Resilience

Insurance alone cannot eliminate AI risk and should not be a substitute for operational resilience. Organizations building genuine AI resilience are investing in:

  • Formal AI governance frameworks
  • Meaningful oversight of consequential decisions
  • Ongoing model monitoring and auditing
  • Employee training on responsible AI use
  • Clearly articulated responsible AI principles
  • Tested incident response plans specifically for AI-related failures.

A well-governed AI program will also make a business significantly more insurable, as underwriters increasingly price risk based on demonstrated controls.

Conclusion

AI has become one of the greatest sources of competitive advantage as well as a new source of liability. As regulatory scrutiny increases and AI-driven decisions become more consequential, executives must broaden their understanding of enterprise risk. Insurance should not be viewed as a substitute for governance, oversight or responsible AI practices.

For businesses increasingly relying on AI, the question is no longer whether AI creates liability risk, but whether existing insurance is equipped to respond to it.